کدخدایی: آژانس انرژی اتمی و شورای امنیت توسط آمریکا و غرب کارکردزدایی شده‌اند

According to the Guardian Council, Abbas Ali Kadkhodai, a lawyer and head of the Guardian Council Research Institute, said in an interview with Khorramshahr television program on Saturday (July 9th) on the Sima Horizon Network: International relations and what we know today as an international system. After the wars and clashes in Europe, especially the thirty -year wars and the empires collapsed, the state -states formed to have independent sovereignty, to be equal in legal aspects, and to regulate the influence of powerless and empowerment in society; These were the primary steps in the international arena that we reached the Vienna Congress in the 19th century (year 2).

He added: “Then the first and second World Wars took place. After World War I, a structure was formed internationally that various people and scholars had discussed in the past; They expected the simulation of domestic systems to be formed internationally. The result of those discussions became the community of the United Nations, which was based on the covenant and we saw more international regulation. The excellent goal of the Covenant was mainly peace and security, and it was said that governments had to move through a peaceful path.

The University of Tehran International Law Professor continued: There was also a place that if a government wants to resort to force, war, etc., it must be removed from the Covenant and the United Nations, which led to the weakness and collapse of the United Nations; So when we reached World War II, we saw the formation of the United Nations and the United Nations; This happened in year 2.

Deconstructing from international institutions

The institutionalism in the international arena was based on well -known principles and rules, including the equality of governments, the independence and sovereignty of governments, the lack of force and the non -interference of coercive interference in the affairs of the country. These were things that reason accepted and approved in every society; Therefore, as the foundation of the new international system, they were recognized after year 2. The institutions also developed later.

He said: In addition to the United Nations, other institutions, including the United Nations and independent organizations, were also formed, and the world was rapidly witnessing the formation of international institutions. At that time, the image was that if we had an institution in the international arena for everything, we could regulate and control the relationships between governments. This space existed until the Soviet Union collapsed and the Cold War was spent.
The head of the Research Institute of the Guardian Council added: “From then on, especially in the West and the United States, a new look has been formed, and the norms of governments, especially governments such as the United States, became the basis of work; That is, we saw a review and analysis of the actions of the main actors, and instead of prohibiting the use of force and non -intervention that had a number of predetermined principles and rules, a series of social goals such as power and wealth were pursued.

So these institutions were out of their original function, and governments acted more and more problem -oriented. Dual behavior is the result we can have of this situation. The great powers sought to form this situation, and theorists also invented and invented its theories. Their axis was mostly norms and procedures that have great powers.

US and Western crossing from the United Nations

The legal member of the Guardian Council explained the first result of the above situation: Small and medium -sized governments have actually been out of time and have no role. Rather, it is the behavior and norms formed by the great governments. Great powers interpret power and wealth based on their own opinion and say that we have nothing predetermined and the basic rule we want to adhere to. We have a number of values for ourselves. Power and wealth are also what we define. On the basis of their behaviors are also adjusted; Therefore, they expect Government A to be adjusted to Government B based on the norms of these governments.

He added: “We have a weaker state in international law discussions, which is also called the next procedure.” In some places based on well -known principles and rules, it may have an impact, but what we see in this new theory and the behavior that these great governments have is to interpret based on their own national interests. In other words, when we want to speak of rights, the rights of a politics -oriented issue will become a relative.

“So, from their point of view, the United Nations can be effective as long as it provides the interests of the large countries,” he said. If it is not provided afterwards, I will go for another solution that becomes a group of seven. Group Seven is more of a club between the great powers, and the institutionalism is not the same as the United Nations. When the great and active powers become active, smaller governments are outside this pole and will not play a role, but they must only be subject to these policies.

In this regard, he exemplified the FATF and said: “The FATF is neither an organization nor required.” No government has gone to give it a commitment. Group countries have defined seven standards for monetary and banking relations; There are standards that cannot be treated outside of these standards. These standards are the norms they created and based on their interests.

Information Agency and Security Council

The head of the Research Institute of the Guardian Council said: “In the aggression that the Zionist regime had against our country, Trump spoke of peace through power.” If the first Article Introduction to the Charter of Peace is emphasized peacefully, Trump says peace is through power! Dispute resolution authorities have been created in the world to resolve peaceful disputes, but Trump speaks of peace through power.

“The United States and some Western countries have changed the path of the international system,” he said. This situation is opposed to international scholars and scholars. We should not allow this to do so. But that’s the facts.

“The statute of the agency has emphasized the use and growth of the peaceful nuclear industry and helping to develop the nuclear industry of different countries,” said Codex of the International Atomic Agency. Even in the NPT treaty, the goals are. But when the Islamic Republic of Iran protests and says that my nuclear facilities are attacked and the agency has a duty to investigate and protect the peaceful nuclear activities and facilities, it does not make a statement and does not react.

He said: The Zionist regime carried out an attack on Iraqi nuclear facilities during the Cold War period. The Security Council issued a resolution that emphasized the right to Iraq and any other country. The prohibition of rape of nuclear facilities, punishment of transgressors and compensation were also included in the resolution. The Islamic Republic of Iran demanded the Security Council in recent cases and the aggression that the Zionist and US regime had. But the Security Council held only a meeting, a conversation was held and no decision was made.

Necessity

The above -mentioned view in the post -Soviet period has imposed itself on the international community and it is the task of many countries, lawyers and scholars not to allow these methods to replace themselves as a school in the international arena.

He also pointed out that our membership and other countries in the United Nations and international institutions are not for today and tomorrow. Iran has been a member of the United Nations for two years and was recognized as the founder of the United Nations at the San Francisco Conference. However, these organizations are now and operate, and in some ways they work. We believe that the more aligned countries should not allow the move that some countries have begun to be institutionalized internationally.

“We must be able to use the old capacity of these institutions for the national interests of the member states,” said a member of the Guardian Council. We need to have more diplomatic activities and activities. We need to have more relationship with the same countries. Incidentally, the US and some countries are also fleeing the majority that governments have.

US bypassing world institutions

“Unless we had many countries as a member of the United Nations and there was a bipolar atmosphere in the Cold War, all US appeal to Security Council resolutions and other institutions and organizations, but since then, when the majority of governments prevail over the international community, it will create another way,” the University of Tehran said.

He noted: Trump, both in the first and present period, had leaving some international organizations and treaties such as UNESCO. Also, the Americans, despite trying hard to create ICC, were never a member. Recently, the United States has boycotted them because of its actions against the Zionist regime. Or recently boycotted the Human Rights Report.

“Americans accept international methods, institutions and tools as long as they provide their interests, and there is sanctions and threats as long as they move to their interests,” said Kadda.

The need for legal pursuit to receive compensation

In response to a question about receiving international compensation and follow -up, the international law professor said: “International equations in relations between countries are a function of international developments, developments between those countries and the capacity they have. Sometimes there are political and diplomatic considerations; So all of this is effective, and a simple case, such as the internal dispute that we go to court, get a compensation and then we can execute it.

He said: In a number of cases we have and after the reciprocal action, there has been a lot of votes, but we could not execute. The Americans the same as the same way; They unjustly created cases against us and issued a decree against us every day in their domestic courts, but failed to execute a ruling against us. These are the requirements of the international community, but we should not be disappointed in this regard.

Codex also pointed out this: We have a punitive discussion in the international arena called “inequality”. Should we allow us to abandon any government or position in different countries in the international arena, or do we follow the follow -up? It is a time when we are legitimate defense and we have to take the necessary action at the same time. When the Zionist regime began its aggression, the Islamic Republic of Iran responded firmly; This is a debate in the field of armed conflict. But beyond that, we have an extra -issue and a transgressive punishment.

He added: A resolution issued after the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iraqi nuclear facilities emphasizes this; Both the transgressive punishment and the determination and payment of compensation. Special committees must be formed at home and abroad and do evaluations. Finally, the investigating authority determines how real and the vote is based on it.

Should be appreciated by the people

“We must appreciate our good people who stand in critical times in the national interests of the country,” said a member of the Guardian Council’s lawyer. The management of the supreme leader at this particular juncture promoted the admiration of friend and enemy. I was in Tasua Day in one of the community. A gentleman came and said I am a opponent, but I would like to kiss the supreme leader’s hand for the measures he had in five days.

“We should not go for the differences of tastes in every society and country,” he said. We have to pay attention to the big national interests. We have to see what our national macro interests are and what is our common enemy? Imam Khomeini said that wearing all the screams on America. When there was a difference of political tastes and issues, they were paying attention to the main enemy of America and that all our attention should be on the main enemy.

“The problems of our good people need to be addressed,” Coddie said. We must go beyond the political debate and … to the supreme leader’s command and move on to their national interests based on his measures. If we move along this path, no enemy can hit the Islamic Republic of Iran and the interests of the people. Good people are always on the scene and we must be grateful and preserve the value of this great blessing, the religious democracy that Imam Khomeini has created and the supreme leader is constantly emphasizing.

End of message/